Oct
10
2018
--

MongoDB Replica set Scenarios and Internals

MongoDB replica sets replication internals r

MongoDB replica sets replication internals rThe MongoDB® replica set is a group of nodes with one set as the primary node, and all other nodes set as secondary nodes. Only the primary node accepts “write” operations, while other nodes can only serve “read” operations according to the read preferences defined. In this blog post, we’ll focus on some MongoDB replica set scenarios, and take a look at the internals.

Example configuration

We will refer to a three node replica set that includes one primary node and two secondary nodes running as:

"members" : [
{
"_id" : 0,
"name" : "192.168.103.100:25001",
"health" : 1,
"state" : 1,
"stateStr" : "PRIMARY",
"uptime" : 3533,
"optime" : {
"ts" : Timestamp(1537800584, 1),
"t" : NumberLong(1)
},
"optimeDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44Z"),
"electionTime" : Timestamp(1537797392, 2),
"electionDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T13:56:32Z"),
"configVersion" : 3,
"self" : true
},
{
"_id" : 1,
"name" : "192.168.103.100:25002",
"health" : 1,
"state" : 2,
"stateStr" : "SECONDARY",
"uptime" : 3063,
"optime" : {
"ts" : Timestamp(1537800584, 1),
"t" : NumberLong(1)
},
"optimeDurable" : {
"ts" : Timestamp(1537800584, 1),
"t" : NumberLong(1)
},
"optimeDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44Z"),
"optimeDurableDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44Z"),
"lastHeartbeat" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:45.539Z"),
"lastHeartbeatRecv" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44.664Z"),
"pingMs" : NumberLong(0),
"syncingTo" : "192.168.103.100:25001",
"configVersion" : 3
},
{
"_id" : 2,
"name" : "192.168.103.100:25003",
"health" : 1,
"state" : 2,
"stateStr" : "SECONDARY",
"uptime" : 2979,
"optime" : {
"ts" : Timestamp(1537800584, 1),
"t" : NumberLong(1)
},
"optimeDurable" : {
"ts" : Timestamp(1537800584, 1),
"t" : NumberLong(1)
},
"optimeDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44Z"),
"optimeDurableDate" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44Z"),
"lastHeartbeat" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:45.539Z"),
"lastHeartbeatRecv" : ISODate("2018-09-24T14:49:44.989Z"),
"pingMs" : NumberLong(0),
"syncingTo" : "192.168.103.100:25002",
"configVersion" : 3
}

Here, the primary is running on port 25001, and the two secondaries are running on ports 25002 and 25003 on the same host.

Secondary nodes can only sync from Primary?

No, it’s not mandatory. Each secondary can replicate data from the primary or any other secondary to the node that is syncing. This term is also known as chaining, and by default, this is enabled.

In the above replica set, you can see that secondary node

"_id":2 

  is syncing from another secondary node

"_id":1

   as

"syncingTo" : "192.168.103.100:25002" 

This can also be found in the logs as here the parameter

chainingAllowed :true

   is the default setting.

settings: { chainingAllowed: true, heartbeatIntervalMillis: 2000, heartbeatTimeoutSecs: 10, electionTimeoutMillis: 10000, catchUpTimeoutMillis: 60000, getLastErrorModes: {}, getLastErrorDefaults: { w: 1, wtimeout: 0 }, replicaSetId: ObjectId('5ba8ed10d4fddccfedeb7492') } }

Chaining?

That means that a secondary member node is able to replicate from another secondary member node instead of from the primary node. This helps to reduce the load from the primary. If the replication lag is not tolerable, then chaining could be disabled.

For more details about chaining and the steps to disable it please refer to my earlier blog post here.

Ok, then how does the secondary node select the source to sync from?

If Chaining is False

When chaining is explicitly set to be false, then the secondary node will sync from the primary node only or could be overridden temporarily.

If Chaining is True

  • Before choosing any sync node, TopologyCoordinator performs validations like:
    • Whether chaining is set to true or false.
    • If that particular node is part of the current replica set configurations.
    • Identify the node ahead with oplog with the lowest ping time.
    • The source code that includes validation is here.
  • Once the validation is done, SyncSourceSelector relies on SyncSourceResolver which contains the result and details for the new sync source
  • To get the details and response, SyncSourceResolver coordinates with ReplicationCoordinator
  • This ReplicationCoordinator is responsible for the replication, and co-ordinates with TopologyCoordinator
  • The TopologyCoordinator is responsible for topology of the cluster. It finds the primary oplog time and checks for the maxSyncSourceLagSecs
  • It will reject the source to sync from if the maxSyncSourceLagSecs  is greater than the newest oplog entry. The code for this can be found here
  • If the criteria for the source selection is not fulfilled, then BackgroundSync thread waits and restarts the whole process again to get the sync source.

Example for “unable to find a member to sync from” then, in the next attempt, finding a candidate to sync from

This can be found in the log like this. On receiving the message from rsBackgroundSync thread

could not find member to sync from

, the whole internal process restarts and finds a member to sync from i.e.

sync source candidate: 192.168.103.100:25001

, which means it is now syncing from node 192.168.103.100 running on port 25001.

2018-09-24T13:58:43.197+0000 I REPL     [rsSync] transition to RECOVERING
2018-09-24T13:58:43.198+0000 I REPL     [rsBackgroundSync] could not find member to sync from
2018-09-24T13:58:43.201+0000 I REPL     [rsSync] transition to SECONDARY
2018-09-24T13:58:59.208+0000 I REPL     [rsBackgroundSync] sync source candidate: 192.168.103.100:25001

  • Once the sync source node is selected, SyncSourceResolver probes the sync source to confirm that it is able to fetch the oplogs.
  • RollbackID is also fetched i.e. rbid  after the first batch is returned by oplogfetcher.
  • If all eligible sync sources are too fresh, such as during initial sync, then the syncSourceStatus Oplog start is missing and earliestOpTimeSeen will set a new minValid.
  • This minValid is also set in the case of rollback and abrupt shutdown.
  • If the node has a minValid entry then this is checked for the eligible sync source node.

Example showing the selection of a new sync source when the existing source is found to be invalid

Here, as the logs show, during sync the node chooses a new sync source. This is because it found the original sync source is not ahead, so not does not contain recent oplogs from which to sync.

2018-09-25T15:20:55.424+0000 I REPL     [replication-1] Choosing new sync source because our current sync source, 192.168.103.100:25001, has an OpTime ({ ts: Timestamp 1537879296000|1, t: 4 }) which is not ahead of ours ({ ts: Timestamp 1537879296000|1, t: 4 }), it does not have a sync source, and it's not the primary (sync source does not know the primary)

2018-09-25T15:20:55.425+0000 W REPL [rsBackgroundSync] Fetcher stopped querying remote oplog with error: InvalidSyncSource: sync source 192.168.103.100:25001 (config version: 3; last applied optime: { ts: Timestamp 1537879296000|1, t: 4 }; sync source index: -1; primary index: -1) is no longer valid

  • If the secondary node is too far behind the eligible sync source node, then the node will enter maintenance node and then resync needs to be call manually.
  • Once the sync source is chosen, BackgroundSync starts oplogFetcher.

Example for oplogFetcher

Here is an example of fetching oplog from the “oplog.rs” collection, and checking for the greater than required timestamp.

2018-09-26T10:35:07.372+0000 I COMMAND  [conn113] command local.oplog.rs command: getMore { getMore: 20830044306, collection: "oplog.rs", maxTimeMS: 5000, term: 7, lastKnownCommittedOpTime: { ts: Timestamp 1537955038000|1, t: 7 } } originatingCommand: { find: "oplog.rs", filter: { ts: { $gte: Timestamp 1537903865000|1 } }, tailable: true, oplogReplay: true, awaitData: true, maxTimeMS: 60000, term: 7, readConcern: { afterOpTime: { ts: Timestamp 1537903865000|1, t: 6 } } } planSummary: COLLSCAN cursorid:20830044306 keysExamined:0 docsExamined:0 numYields:1 nreturned:0 reslen:451 locks:{ Global: { acquireCount: { r: 6 } }, Database: { acquireCount: { r: 3 } }, oplog: { acquireCount: { r: 3 } } } protocol:op_command 3063398ms

When and what details replica set nodes communicate with each other?

At a regular interval, all the nodes communicate with each other to check the status of the primary node, check the status of the sync source, to get the oplogs and so on.

ReplicationCoordinator has ReplicaSetConfig that has a list of all the replica set nodes, and each node has a copy of it. This makes nodes aware of other nodes under same replica set.

This is how nodes communicate in more detail:

Heartbeats: This checks the status of other nodes i.e. alive or die

heartbeatInterval: Every node, at an interval of two seconds, sends the other nodes a heartbeat to make them aware that “yes I am alive!”

heartbeatTimeoutSecs: This is a timeout, and means that if the heartbeat is not returned in 10 seconds then that node is marked as inaccessible or simply die.

Every heartbeat is identified by these replica set details:

  • replica set config version
  • replica set name
  • Sender host address
  • id from the replicasetconfig

The source code could be referred to from here.

When the remote node receives the heartbeat, it processes this data and validates if the details are correct. It then prepares a ReplSetHeartbeatResponse, that includes:

  • Name of the replica set, config version, and optime details
  • Details about primary node as per the receiving node.
  • Sync source details and state of receiving node

This heartbeat data is processed, and if primary details are found then the election gets postponed.

TopologyCoordinator checks for the heartbeat data and confirms if the node is OK or NOT. If the node is OK then no action is taken. Otherwise it needs to be reconfigured or else initiate a priority takeover based on the config.

Response from oplog fetcher

To get the oplogs from the sync source, nodes communicate with each other. This oplog fetcher fetches oplogs through “find” and “getMore”. This will only affect the downstream node that gets metadata from its sync source to update its view from the replica set.

OplogQueryMetadata only comes with OplogFetcher responses

OplogQueryMetadata comes with OplogFetcher response and ReplSetMetadata comes with all the replica set details including configversion and replication commands.

Communicate to update Position commands:

This is to get an update for replication progress. ReplicationCoordinatorExternalState creates SyncSourceFeedback sends replSetUpdatePosition commands.

It includes Oplog details, Replicaset config version, and replica set metadata.

If a new node is added to the existing replica set, how will that node get the data?

If a new node is added to the existing replica set then the “initial sync” process takes place. This initial sync can be done in two ways:

  1. Just add the new node to the replicaset and let initial sync threads restore the data. Then it syncs from the oplogs until it reaches the secondary state.
  2. Copy the data from the recent data directory to the node, and restart this new node. Then it will also sync from the oplogs until it reaches the secondary state.

This is how it works internally

When “initial sync” or “rsync” is called by ReplicationCoordinator  then the node goes to “STARTUP2” state, and this initial sync is done in DataReplicator

  • A sync source is selected to get the data from, then it drops all the databases except the local database, and oplogs are recreated.
  • DatabasesCloner asks syncsource for a list of the databases, and for each database it creates DatabaseCloner.
  • For each DatabaseCloner it creates CollectionCloner to clone the collections
  • This CollectionCloner calls ListIndexes on the syncsource and creates a CollectionBulkLoader for parallel index creation while data cloning
  • The node also checks for the sync source rollback id. If rollback occurred, then it restarts the initial sync. Otherwise, datareplicator is done with its work and then replicationCoordinator assumes the role for ongoing replication.

Example for the “initial sync” :

Here node enters  

"STARTUP2"- "transition to STARTUP2"

Then sync source gets selected and drops all the databases except the local database.  Next, replication oplog is created and CollectionCloner is called.

Local database not dropped: because every node has its own “local” database with its own and other nodes’ information, based on itself, this database is not replicated to other nodes.

2018-09-26T17:57:09.571+0000 I REPL     [ReplicationExecutor] transition to STARTUP2
2018-09-26T17:57:14.589+0000 I REPL     [replication-1] sync source candidate: 192.168.103.100:25003
2018-09-26T17:57:14.590+0000 I STORAGE  [replication-1] dropAllDatabasesExceptLocal 1
2018-09-26T17:57:14.592+0000 I REPL     [replication-1] creating replication oplog of size: 990MB... 2018-09-26T17:57:14.633+0000 I REPL     [replication-0] CollectionCloner::start called, on ns:admin.system.version

Finished fetching all the oplogs, and finishing up initial sync.

2018-09-26T17:57:15.685+0000 I REPL     [replication-0] Finished fetching oplog during initial sync: CallbackCanceled: Callback canceled. Last fetched optime and hash: { ts: Timestamp 1537984626000|1, t: 9 }[-1139925876765058240]
2018-09-26T17:57:15.685+0000 I REPL     [replication-0] Initial sync attempt finishing up.

What are oplogs and where do these reside?

oplogs stands for “operation logs”. We have used this term so many times in this blog post as these are the mandatory logs for the replica set. These operations are in the capped collection called “oplog.rs”  that resides in “local” database.

Below, this is how oplogs are stored in the collection “oplog.rs” that includes details for timestamp, operations, namespace, output.

rplint:PRIMARY> use local
rplint:PRIMARY> show collections
oplog.rs
rplint:PRIMARY> db.oplog.rs.findOne()
{
 "ts" : Timestamp(1537797392, 1),
 "h" : NumberLong("-169301588285533642"),
 "v" : 2,
 "op" : "n",
 "ns" : "",
 "o" : {
 "msg" : "initiating set"
 }
}

It consists of rolling update operations coming to the database. Then these oplogs replicate to the secondary node(s) to maintain the high availability of the data in case of failover.

When the replica MongoDB instance starts, it creates an oplog ocdefault size. For Wired tiger, the default size is 5% of disk space, with a lower bound size of 990MB. So here in the example it creates 990MB of data. If you’d like to learn more about oplog size then please refer here

2018-09-26T17:57:14.592+0000 I REPL     [replication-1] creating replication oplog of size: 990MB...

What if the same oplog is applied multiple times, will that not lead to inconsistent data?

Fortunately, oplogs are Idempotent that means the value will remain unchanged, or will provide the same output, even when applied multiple times.

Let’s check an example:

For the $inc operator that will increment the value by 1 for the filed “item”, if this oplog is applied multiple times then the result might lead to an inconsistent record if this is not Idempotent. However, rather than increasing the item value multiple times, it is actually applied only once.

rplint:PRIMARY> use db1
//inserting one document
rplint:PRIMARY> db.col1.insert({item:1, name:"abc"})
//updating document by incrementing item value with 1
rplint:PRIMARY> db.col1.update({name:"abc"},{$inc:{item:1}})
//updated value is now item:2
rplint:PRIMARY> db.col1.find()
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5babd57cce2ef78096ac8e16"), "item" : 2, "name" : "abc" }

This is how these operations are stored in oplog, here this $inc value is stored in oplog as $set

rplint:PRIMARY> db.oplog.rs.find({ns:"db1.col1"})
//insert operation
{ "ts" : Timestamp(1537987964, 2), "t" : NumberLong(9), "h" : NumberLong("8083740413874479202"), "v" : 2, "op" : "i", "ns" : "db1.col1", "o" : { "_id" : ObjectId("5babd57cce2ef78096ac8e16"), "item" : 1, "name" : "abc" } }
//$inc operation is changed as ""$set" : { "item" : 2"
{ "ts" : Timestamp(1537988022, 1), "t" : NumberLong(9), "h" : NumberLong("-1432987813358665721"), "v" : 2, "op" : "u", "ns" : "db1.col1", "o2" : { "_id" : ObjectId("5babd57cce2ef78096ac8e16") }, "o" : { "$set" : { "item" : 2 } } }

That means that however many  times it is applied, it will generate the same results, so no inconsistent data!

I hope this blog post helps you to understand multiple scenarios for MongoDB replica sets, and how data replicates to the nodes.

Apr
12
2017
--

ProxySQL Rules: Applying and Chaining the Rules

ProxySQL Rules

In this post, I am going to show you how you can minimize the performance impact of ProxySQL rules by using some finesse.

Apply Test

In my previous post, we could see the effect of the rules on ProxySQL performance. As we could also see, the “apply” option does not help with 1000 tables. Are we sure about this? Let’s consider: if we know 90% of our traffic won’t match any rules, it doesn’t matter if we have 10 or 500 rules – it has to check all of them. And this is going to have a serious effect on performance. How can we avoid that?

Let’s insert rule number ONE, which matches all queries, like this:

insert into mysql_query_rules (username,destination_hostgroup,active,retries,match_digest,apply) values('testuser_rw',600,1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest([1-9]d{3,}|[1-9][0-9][1-9])b',1);

This rule matches all queries where table names > sbtest100. But again, this logic also can be applied on “userids” or any other keys. We just have to know our application and our query distribution.

With this rule, the 90% of the queries have to check only one rule (the first one):

Now we have 101 rules, but the performance is almost the same as when we had only ten rules! As we can see, creating the rules based on our query distribution has a huge impact!

But what if we don’t know which queries are the busiest, or every query has the same amount of hits? Can we do anything? Yes, we can.

Chaining

In my previous post, I mentioned the “flagIN”, “flagOUT” options. With these options we can chain the rules. But why is that good for us?

If we have 100 rules and 100 tables, even with applying, on average ProxySQL has to check 50 rules. But if we write rules like these:

insert into mysql_query_rules (flagin,flagout,username,active,retries,match_digest,apply) VALUES
(0,1000,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest.b',0),
(0,1100,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest1.b',0),
(0,1200,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest2.b',0),
(0,1300,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest3.b',0),
(0,1400,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest4.b',0),
(0,1500,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest5.b',0),
(0,1600,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest6.b',0),
(0,1700,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest7.b',0),
(0,1800,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest8.b',0),
(0,1900,'testuser_rw',1,3,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest9.b',0);
insert into mysql_query_rules (flagin,destination_hostgroup,active,match_digest,apply) VALUES
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest11b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest12b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest13b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest14b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest15b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest16b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest17b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest18b',1),
(1100,600,1,'(from|into|update|into table) sbtest19b',1);
...

We are going to have more than 100 rules, but first we match on the first digit after the second and then go on. With this approach ProxySQL has to only check 15 rules on average.

Let’s see the results:

As we can see, even with more rules, chaining is way faster than without chaining.

Tips

Hits

ProxySQL keeps statistics about a rule’s hits. When you add a rule you can see how many queries it applied to:

select * from stats_mysql_query_rules;
+---------+------+
| rule_id | hits |
+---------+------+
| 2 | 6860 |
| 3 | 6440 |
| 4 | 6880 |
| 5 | 6610 |
| 6 | 6850 |
| 7 | 7130 |
| 8 | 6620 |
| 9 | 7300 |
| 10 | 6750 |
| 11 | 7050 |
| 12 | 7280 |
| 13 | 6780 |
| 14 | 6670 |
...

Query_Processor_time_nsec

ProxySQL does not record how much time it spends on a rule (not yet, anyway: https://github.com/sysown/proxysql/issues/966), but it has a global stat:

select * from stats_mysql_global where Variable_name="Query_Processor_time_nsec";
+---------------------------+----------------+
| Variable_Name | Variable_Value |
+---------------------------+----------------+
| Query_Processor_time_nsec | 3184114671740 |
+---------------------------+----------------+

You can monitor this statistic, and if you see a huge increase after you added a rule, you might want to review it again.

Conclusion

ProxySQL can handle many rules, and of course they have some costs. But if you design your rules based on your workload and your query distribution, you can minimize this cost a lot.

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Aeros 2.0 by TheBuckmaker.com